First, let's take a look at the macros. Each of these are listed in grams and as usual, normalized to 200 calories for easy comparison, so we're always comparing apples to apples.
Mackerel | Chicken |
Nutrient | mackerel | chicken |
Protein | 18g | 20g |
Carbohydrate | 0g | 0g |
Fiber | 0g | 0g |
Fat | 14g | 13g |
Monounsat. Fat | 5g | 13g |
Polyunsat. Fat | 3g | 3g |
Saturated Fat | 3g | 4g |
Next, let's take a look at the Vitamin density. These values are shown in units of percent of recommended daily intake. And since we're showing 200 calories worth, this means anything above 10% is good.
Nutrient | mackerel | chicken |
Choline | 15% | 12% |
Vitamin A | 8% | 6% |
Vitamin C | 1% | 0% |
Vitamin E | 12% | 2% |
Vitamin K | 6% | 4% |
Mackerel have significantly more Vitamins E than chicken. Mackerel are a good source of Riboflavin, Vitamin B6, Magnesium, Phosphorus, Iron. Mackerel are a great source of Niacin. Mackerel are an excellent source of Vitamin B12. Chicken are a good source of Vitamin B6, Zinc, Phosphorus. Chicken are a great source of Niacin.
And here we see the B-vitamins: B1 (Thiamin), B2 (Riboflavin), B3 (Niacin), B5 (Pantothenic Acid), B6 (Pyridoxine)
Nutrient | mackerel | chicken |
Vitamin B1 | 17% | 5% |
Vitamin B2 | 28% | 16% |
Vitamin B3 | 74% | 43% |
Vitamin B5 | 17% | 18% |
Vitamin B6 | 35% | 23% |
Vitamin B12 | 425% | 12% |
Now, lets look at mineral density. Here we have a lot of important electrolytes and minerals. Once again, units are in percent of RDI, thus for this 200 calorie serving anything above 10% would considered high.
Nutrient | mackerel | chicken |
Sodium | 6% | 5% |
Potasium | 9% | 5% |
Calcium | 2% | 2% |
Magnesium | 21% | 5% |
Phosphorus | 37% | 24% |
Iron | 27% | 18% |
Manganese | 1% | 1% |
Selenium | 96% | 35% |
Copper | 7% | 6% |
Zinc | 7% | 20% |
You can use the Nutrient based Food and recipe finder, to rank foods based on nutrients:
And get results like this: